Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HERITAGE VALLEY BEAVER 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HERITAGE VALLEY BEAVER
CCN 390036 | PA | 148 beds | Current EBITDA $-35.0M → Pro Forma $-23.4M (+$11.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$220.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-35.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-23.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$11.6M
Modeled Uplift
$8.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.2M (vs $11.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$141K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.4M$4.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.2M$121K$4.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$675K$2.0M$2.7M$8.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$141K$141K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$892K$1.8M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$70K$141K$141K$141K$141K$141K$141K
Cumulative$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.4M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-35.0M$-35.0M-15.9%
Year 1$-36.1M+$7.7M$-28.3M-12.9%
Year 2$-37.1M+$11.6M$-25.6M-11.6%
Year 3$-38.3M+$11.6M$-26.7M-12.1%
Year 4$-39.4M+$11.6M$-27.8M-12.6%
Year 5$-40.6M+$11.6M$-29.0M-13.2%
$-350.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-319.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.0M
Value Created
$-29.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-55.8M
Organic Growth
$115.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-29.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$70K$106K$141K$169K
Total$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$13.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 102 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.9%-19.1%-7.6%4.7%
P30
Net-to-Gross31.9%17.5%24.4%33.1%
P71
Occupancy68.5%44.9%59.0%74.5%
P67
Rev/Bed$1.5M$522K$1.0M$1.5M
P74
Exp/Bed$1.7M$556K$1.1M$1.6M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML