Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LANSDALE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LANSDALE HOSPITAL
CCN 390012 | PA | 140 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $7.5M (+$4.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$94.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $4.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$60K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$52K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$288K$855K$1.1M$3.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$60K$60K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$470K$940K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$465K$930K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$381K$762K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.7x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.7x
9.0x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.4x
10.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
11.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
12.0x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M2.8%
Year 1$2.7M+$3.3M$6.0M6.3%
Year 2$2.7M+$4.9M$7.7M8.2%
Year 3$2.8M+$4.9M$7.8M8.3%
Year 4$2.9M+$4.9M$7.9M8.4%
Year 5$3.0M+$4.9M$7.9M8.5%
$25.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$87.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$61.5M
Value Created
$7.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.1M
Organic Growth
$49.4M
RCM Value Creation
$7.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$940K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$930K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$572K$858K$1.1M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$45K$60K$72K
Total$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-18.7%-8.0%5.1%
P69
Net-to-Gross23.5%18.3%25.5%34.3%
P44
Occupancy48.8%44.8%59.9%76.5%
P30
Rev/Bed$671K$501K$1.0M$1.5M
P36
Exp/Bed$653K$527K$1.1M$1.6M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML