Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GEISINGER BLOOMSBURG HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GEISINGER BLOOMSBURG HOSPITAL
CCN 390003 | PA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $4.9M → Pro Forma $8.8M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$75.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$916K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$48K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$231K$685K$916K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$48K$48K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$377K$753K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$373K$746K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$305K$611K$916K$916K$916K$916K$916K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.8x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x
9.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
10.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x
11.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
12.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
28%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 28% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.9M$4.9M6.5%
Year 1$5.0M+$2.6M$7.6M10.2%
Year 2$5.2M+$4.0M$9.1M12.1%
Year 3$5.3M+$4.0M$9.3M12.3%
Year 4$5.5M+$4.0M$9.4M12.5%
Year 5$5.6M+$4.0M$9.6M12.7%
$48.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$105.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.0M
Value Created
$9.6M
Exit EBITDA
$7.7M
Organic Growth
$39.6M
RCM Value Creation
$9.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$753K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$746K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$458K$687K$916K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$48K$58K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.5%-12.5%1.7%9.0%
P64
Net-to-Gross16.4%21.7%31.7%44.0%
P12
Occupancy55.2%27.9%46.8%69.3%
P60
Rev/Bed$1.9M$414K$841K$1.8M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.8M$391K$963K$1.5M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML