Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UPMC MCKEESPORT 2026-04-26 06:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UPMC MCKEESPORT
CCN 390002 | PA | 186 beds | Current EBITDA $-48.3M → Pro Forma $-41.9M (+$6.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$121.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-48.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-41.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$6.4M
Modeled Uplift
$4.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.3M (vs $6.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$78K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$67K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$374K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$78K$78K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$609K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$603K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$494K$989K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-48.3M$-48.3M-39.6%
Year 1$-49.8M+$4.3M$-45.5M-37.3%
Year 2$-51.2M+$6.4M$-44.8M-36.8%
Year 3$-52.8M+$6.4M$-46.4M-38.0%
Year 4$-54.4M+$6.4M$-48.0M-39.3%
Year 5$-56.0M+$6.4M$-49.6M-40.7%
$-483.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-545.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-62.4M
Value Created
$-49.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-76.9M
Organic Growth
$64.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-49.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$742K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$59K$78K$94K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-39.6%-18.7%-8.0%2.0%
P6
Net-to-Gross15.2%16.7%23.0%30.7%
P17
Occupancy54.5%48.5%60.0%76.0%
P32
Rev/Bed$655K$619K$1.2M$1.6M
P27
Exp/Bed$915K$650K$1.2M$1.7M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML