Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 390001 | PA | 266 beds | Current EBITDA $14.7M → Pro Forma $39.6M (+$24.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$474.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$24.9M
Modeled Uplift
$18.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.1M (vs $24.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$303K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.5M$9.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.1M$261K$9.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.3M$5.8M$18.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$303K$303K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$152K$303K$303K$303K$303K$303K$303K
Cumulative$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.2M$24.9M$24.9M$24.9M$24.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x78% / 17.7x82% / 20.0x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.5x90% / 24.6x
9.0x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.6x
10.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x
11.0x64% / 12.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.3x75% / 16.2x76% / 17.0x
12.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.4x
Headroom (turns)
52%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 52% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.1x, adding 5.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.7M$14.7M3.1%
Year 1$15.1M+$16.6M$31.7M6.7%
Year 2$15.5M+$24.9M$40.5M8.5%
Year 3$16.0M+$24.9M$41.0M8.6%
Year 4$16.5M+$24.9M$41.4M8.7%
Year 5$17.0M+$24.9M$41.9M8.8%
$146.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$461.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$314.7M
Value Created
$41.9M
Exit EBITDA
$23.3M
Organic Growth
$249.4M
RCM Value Creation
$41.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$11.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Clean Claim Rate$152K$228K$303K$364K
Total$12.5M$18.7M$24.9M$29.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.1%-16.7%-8.0%-0.9%
P83
Net-to-Gross12.4%15.6%22.2%28.5%
P0
Occupancy77.3%53.7%62.8%77.3%
P75
Rev/Bed$1.8M$988K$1.3M$1.7M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.7M$929K$1.4M$1.7M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML