Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CURRY HEALTH DISTRICT 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CURRY HEALTH DISTRICT
CCN 381322 | OR | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $320K → Pro Forma $3.8M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$66.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$320K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$807K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$42K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$36K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$203K$603K$807K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$42K$42K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$332K$663K$995K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$328K$656K$985K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$269K$538K$807K$807K$807K$807K$807K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cumulative$0$950K$1.9M$2.8M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x143% / 84.9x148% / 94.7x153% / 104.5x156% / 109.4x158% / 114.3x
9.0x137% / 75.1x142% / 83.8x147% / 92.5x150% / 96.8x152% / 101.2x
10.0x132% / 67.3x137% / 75.1x142% / 82.9x144% / 86.8x146% / 90.8x
11.0x127% / 60.9x133% / 68.0x137% / 75.1x139% / 78.7x142% / 82.2x
12.0x123% / 55.5x128% / 62.0x133% / 68.6x135% / 71.8x137% / 75.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.8x
Headroom (turns)
89%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 89% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.7x, adding 7.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$320K$320K0.5%
Year 1$330K+$2.3M$2.7M4.0%
Year 2$340K+$3.5M$3.8M5.8%
Year 3$350K+$3.5M$3.8M5.8%
Year 4$360K+$3.5M$3.8M5.8%
Year 5$371K+$3.5M$3.9M5.8%
$3.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$42.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.2M
Value Created
$3.9M
Exit EBITDA
$510K
Organic Growth
$34.9M
RCM Value Creation
$3.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$663K$995K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$656K$985K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$403K$605K$807K$968K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$32K$42K$51K
Total$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.5%-12.7%-4.8%3.8%
P62
Net-to-Gross54.5%51.4%57.3%62.4%
P29
Occupancy45.8%32.0%45.0%55.8%
P50
Rev/Bed$4.1M$1.7M$3.8M$4.7M
P58
Exp/Bed$4.1M$1.8M$3.3M$5.1M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML