Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 381320 | OR | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $8.6M → Pro Forma $17.4M (+$8.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$165.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$8.7M
Modeled Uplift
$6.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.6M (vs $8.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$106K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.3M$3.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.2M$91K$3.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$509K$1.5M$2.0M$6.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$106K$106K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$830K$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$821K$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$673K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$53K$106K$106K$106K$106K$106K$106K
Cumulative$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.4x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x
9.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.4x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
10.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
11.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
12.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.6M$8.6M5.2%
Year 1$8.9M+$5.8M$14.7M8.9%
Year 2$9.2M+$8.7M$17.9M10.8%
Year 3$9.4M+$8.7M$18.2M10.9%
Year 4$9.7M+$8.7M$18.4M11.1%
Year 5$10.0M+$8.7M$18.7M11.3%
$86.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$206.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$119.8M
Value Created
$18.7M
Exit EBITDA
$13.7M
Organic Growth
$87.3M
RCM Value Creation
$18.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$53K$80K$106K$127K
Total$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$10.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.2%-15.0%-6.1%3.8%
P77
Net-to-Gross49.6%46.2%54.5%59.9%
P34
Occupancy52.6%32.9%46.2%59.5%
P57
Rev/Bed$6.6M$1.9M$2.8M$4.2M
P94
Exp/Bed$6.3M$2.0M$2.9M$4.4M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML