Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. CHARLES MED CTR - PRINEVILLE 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. CHARLES MED CTR - PRINEVILLE
CCN 381313 | OR | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $15.4M → Pro Forma $18.7M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$62.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$924K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$759K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$191K$568K$759K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$312K$624K$936K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$309K$618K$926K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$253K$506K$759K$759K$759K$759K$759K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$894K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.4M$15.4M24.6%
Year 1$15.8M+$2.2M$18.0M28.9%
Year 2$16.3M+$3.3M$19.6M31.4%
Year 3$16.8M+$3.3M$20.1M32.2%
Year 4$17.3M+$3.3M$20.6M33.0%
Year 5$17.8M+$3.3M$21.1M33.8%
$153.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$232.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$78.4M
Value Created
$21.1M
Exit EBITDA
$24.5M
Organic Growth
$32.8M
RCM Value Creation
$21.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$624K$936K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$618K$926K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$380K$569K$759K$911K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.6%-12.7%-4.8%3.8%
P96
Net-to-Gross55.4%51.4%57.3%62.4%
P42
Occupancy54.1%32.0%45.0%55.8%
P67
Rev/Bed$3.9M$1.7M$3.8M$4.7M
P50
Exp/Bed$2.9M$1.8M$3.3M$5.1M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML