Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WALLOWA COUNTY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WALLOWA COUNTY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT
CCN 381306 | OR | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.4M → Pro Forma $446K (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$446K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$674K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$685K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$678K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$417K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$685K$685K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$660K$19K$678K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$105K$312K$417K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$171K$343K$514K$685K$685K$685K$685K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$170K$339K$509K$678K$678K$678K$678K
A/R Days Reduction$0$139K$278K$417K$417K$417K$417K$417K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$491K$982K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-25.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
32.2x
Headroom (turns)
495%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 495% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -25.7x, adding 124.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.4M$-1.4M-4.0%
Year 1$-1.4M+$1.2M$-195K-0.6%
Year 2$-1.4M+$1.8M$364K1.1%
Year 3$-1.5M+$1.8M$321K0.9%
Year 4$-1.5M+$1.8M$276K0.8%
Year 5$-1.6M+$1.8M$230K0.7%
$-13.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.1M
Value Created
$230K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.2M
Organic Growth
$18.0M
RCM Value Creation
$230K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$343K$514K$685K$822K
Denial Rate Reductio$339K$509K$678K$814K
A/R Days Reduction$208K$313K$417K$500K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$901K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.0%-15.5%-5.9%3.9%
P59
Net-to-Gross62.0%47.2%54.5%60.0%
P79
Occupancy23.0%32.7%46.0%61.0%
P9
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.9M$2.9M$4.2M
P6
Exp/Bed$1.5M$2.0M$2.9M$4.6M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML