Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHERN COOS GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHERN COOS GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 381304 | OR | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.8M → Pro Forma $-298K (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-298K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$978K
Risk-Adjusted
-$476K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$553K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$547K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$336K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$553K$553K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$532K$15K$547K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$85K$252K$336K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$138K$276K$415K$553K$553K$553K$553K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$137K$274K$411K$547K$547K$547K$547K
A/R Days Reduction$0$112K$224K$336K$336K$336K$336K$336K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$396K$792K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.8M$-1.8M-6.3%
Year 1$-1.8M+$970K$-835K-3.0%
Year 2$-1.9M+$1.5M$-405K-1.5%
Year 3$-1.9M+$1.5M$-460K-1.7%
Year 4$-2.0M+$1.5M$-518K-1.9%
Year 5$-2.0M+$1.5M$-577K-2.1%
$-17.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-6.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.2M
Value Created
$-577K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.8M
Organic Growth
$14.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-577K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$276K$415K$553K$663K
Denial Rate Reductio$274K$411K$547K$657K
A/R Days Reduction$168K$252K$336K$404K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$727K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.3%-16.1%-5.5%3.7%
P44
Net-to-Gross63.6%51.1%56.4%62.0%
P76
Occupancy44.3%32.6%44.3%55.5%
P48
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.7M$3.7M$4.6M
P20
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.8M$3.0M$5.0M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML