Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEGACY MOUNT HOOD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEGACY MOUNT HOOD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 380025 | OR | 99 beds | Current EBITDA $-20.2M → Pro Forma $-9.8M (+$10.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$197.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-20.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-9.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$10.4M
Modeled Uplift
$7.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.6M (vs $10.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$126K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.9M$3.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$108K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$605K$1.8M$2.4M$7.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$126K$126K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$986K$2.0M$3.0M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$976K$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$800K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$63K$126K$126K$126K$126K$126K$126K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-20.2M$-20.2M-10.2%
Year 1$-20.8M+$6.9M$-13.9M-7.0%
Year 2$-21.4M+$10.4M$-11.0M-5.6%
Year 3$-22.0M+$10.4M$-11.7M-5.9%
Year 4$-22.7M+$10.4M$-12.3M-6.3%
Year 5$-23.4M+$10.4M$-13.0M-6.6%
$-201.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-143.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$58.6M
Value Created
$-13.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-32.1M
Organic Growth
$103.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-13.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$3.9M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$63K$95K$126K$151K
Total$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.2%-17.3%-12.0%-6.1%
P65
Net-to-Gross31.4%27.1%32.0%37.1%
P35
Occupancy75.4%58.5%66.1%71.7%
P83
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.8M$2.2M$2.4M
P41
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.9M$2.2M$2.7M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML