Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CEDAR RIDGE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CEDAR RIDGE HOSPITAL
CCN 374023 | OK | 116 beds | Current EBITDA $5.2M → Pro Forma $6.7M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$996K
Risk-Adjusted
-$441K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$547K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$541K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$333K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$547K$547K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$526K$15K$541K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$84K$249K$333K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$137K$273K$410K$547K$547K$547K$547K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$135K$271K$406K$541K$541K$541K$541K
A/R Days Reduction$0$111K$222K$333K$333K$333K$333K$333K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$391K$783K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.2M$5.2M19.2%
Year 1$5.4M+$958K$6.4M23.3%
Year 2$5.6M+$1.4M$7.0M25.6%
Year 3$5.7M+$1.4M$7.2M26.2%
Year 4$5.9M+$1.4M$7.3M26.8%
Year 5$6.1M+$1.4M$7.5M27.5%
$52.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$82.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$30.2M
Value Created
$7.5M
Exit EBITDA
$8.3M
Organic Growth
$14.4M
RCM Value Creation
$7.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$273K$410K$547K$656K
Denial Rate Reductio$271K$406K$541K$649K
A/R Days Reduction$166K$249K$333K$399K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$719K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.2%-15.2%-2.8%8.5%
P89
Net-to-Gross61.8%18.0%25.8%33.7%
P94
Occupancy67.6%36.2%57.6%73.2%
P67
Rev/Bed$236K$476K$1.0M$1.4M
P14
Exp/Bed$190K$416K$996K$1.6M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML