Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VALIR REHAB HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VALIR REHAB HOSPITAL
CCN 373025 | OK | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.9M → Pro Forma $-3.0M (+$886K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$886K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$646K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$886K
Modeled Uplift
$642K
Risk-Adjusted
-$244K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$337K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$333K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$205K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$886K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$337K$337K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$324K$9K$333K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$153K$205K$646K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$84K$168K$253K$337K$337K$337K$337K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$83K$167K$250K$333K$333K$333K$333K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$137K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$241K$483K$718K$886K$886K$886K$886K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $886K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.9M$-3.9M-23.3%
Year 1$-4.0M+$591K$-3.5M-20.5%
Year 2$-4.2M+$886K$-3.3M-19.5%
Year 3$-4.3M+$886K$-3.4M-20.2%
Year 4$-4.4M+$886K$-3.5M-21.0%
Year 5$-4.6M+$886K$-3.7M-21.8%
$-39.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-40.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.1M
Value Created
$-3.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.3M
Organic Growth
$8.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$168K$253K$337K$404K
Denial Rate Reductio$167K$250K$333K$400K
A/R Days Reduction$102K$154K$205K$246K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$443K$665K$886K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.3%-23.2%-9.3%2.9%
P24
Net-to-Gross65.1%21.0%32.6%46.4%
P89
Occupancy77.8%19.6%35.3%54.2%
P88
Rev/Bed$337K$377K$646K$1.3M
P19
Exp/Bed$415K$431K$731K$1.6M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML