Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY SHAWNEE 2026-04-26 12:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY SHAWNEE
CCN 372019 | OK | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $-167K → Pro Forma $512K (+$679K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-167K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$679K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$512K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$493K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$679K
Modeled Uplift
$473K
Risk-Adjusted
-$206K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$257K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$256K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$156K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$679K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$257K$257K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$248K$8K$256K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$117K$156K$493K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$64K$129K$193K$257K$257K$257K$257K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$128K$192K$256K$256K$256K$256K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$185K$370K$551K$679K$679K$679K$679K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $679K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.3x
Headroom (turns)
143%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 143% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.8x, adding 101.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-167K$-167K-1.3%
Year 1$-172K+$453K$280K2.2%
Year 2$-177K+$679K$502K3.9%
Year 3$-183K+$679K$496K3.9%
Year 4$-188K+$679K$491K3.8%
Year 5$-194K+$679K$485K3.8%
$-1.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.0M
Value Created
$485K
Exit EBITDA
$-266K
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$485K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$129K$193K$257K$309K
Denial Rate Reductio$128K$192K$256K$307K
A/R Days Reduction$78K$117K$156K$188K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$340K$509K$679K$815K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.3%-23.7%-9.9%3.3%
P66
Net-to-Gross14.4%20.6%35.7%49.8%
P5
Occupancy54.3%17.0%28.4%54.2%
P74
Rev/Bed$378K$375K$627K$1.1M
P26
Exp/Bed$383K$440K$714K$1.4M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML