Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OKC-AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OKC-AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 372005 | OK | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $3.8M → Pro Forma $4.6M (+$758K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$758K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$552K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$758K
Modeled Uplift
$580K
Risk-Adjusted
-$178K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$288K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$285K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$175K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$758K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$288K$288K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$277K$8K$285K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$44K$131K$175K$552K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$72K$144K$216K$288K$288K$288K$288K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$71K$143K$214K$285K$285K$285K$285K
A/R Days Reduction$0$58K$117K$175K$175K$175K$175K$175K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$206K$413K$615K$758K$758K$758K$758K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $758K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.8M$3.8M26.6%
Year 1$3.9M+$505K$4.4M30.9%
Year 2$4.1M+$758K$4.8M33.5%
Year 3$4.2M+$758K$4.9M34.3%
Year 4$4.3M+$758K$5.1M35.2%
Year 5$4.4M+$758K$5.2M36.1%
$38.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$57.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.9M
Value Created
$5.2M
Exit EBITDA
$6.1M
Organic Growth
$7.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$144K$216K$288K$345K
Denial Rate Reductio$143K$214K$285K$342K
A/R Days Reduction$88K$131K$175K$210K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$379K$568K$758K$910K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.6%-29.5%-17.9%-2.0%
P98
Net-to-Gross51.6%21.1%44.5%54.1%
P71
Occupancy88.2%14.9%26.6%50.6%
P95
Rev/Bed$800K$325K$562K$850K
P65
Exp/Bed$587K$481K$694K$1.2M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML