Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSP OF OKLAHOMA CITY 2026-04-26 09:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSP OF OKLAHOMA CITY
CCN 372004 | OK | 78 beds | Current EBITDA $138K → Pro Forma $974K (+$837K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$138K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$837K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$974K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$610K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$837K
Modeled Uplift
$521K
Risk-Adjusted
-$316K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$318K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$315K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$194K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$837K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$318K$318K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$306K$9K$315K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$49K$145K$194K$610K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$80K$159K$239K$318K$318K$318K$318K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$79K$157K$236K$315K$315K$315K$315K
A/R Days Reduction$0$65K$129K$194K$194K$194K$194K$194K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$228K$456K$678K$837K$837K$837K$837K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $837K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x118% / 49.7x123% / 55.6x128% / 61.5x130% / 64.4x132% / 67.3x
9.0x113% / 43.8x118% / 49.0x122% / 54.3x124% / 56.9x126% / 59.5x
10.0x108% / 39.1x113% / 43.8x117% / 48.5x119% / 50.9x121% / 53.2x
11.0x104% / 35.3x109% / 39.5x113% / 43.8x115% / 46.0x117% / 48.1x
12.0x100% / 32.0x105% / 36.0x109% / 39.9x111% / 41.9x113% / 43.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.3x
Headroom (turns)
82%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 82% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.2x, adding 7.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$138K$138K0.9%
Year 1$142K+$558K$700K4.4%
Year 2$146K+$837K$983K6.2%
Year 3$150K+$837K$987K6.2%
Year 4$155K+$837K$992K6.2%
Year 5$160K+$837K$996K6.3%
$1.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.6M
Value Created
$996K
Exit EBITDA
$219K
Organic Growth
$8.4M
RCM Value Creation
$996K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$159K$239K$318K$382K
Denial Rate Reductio$157K$236K$315K$378K
A/R Days Reduction$97K$145K$194K$232K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$418K$628K$837K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-16.8%-3.8%4.9%
P58
Net-to-Gross31.6%18.4%26.7%34.9%
P66
Occupancy29.9%26.2%48.5%67.8%
P31
Rev/Bed$204K$454K$940K$1.4M
P8
Exp/Bed$202K$462K$1.1M$1.6M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML