Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HASKELL REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HASKELL REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 371335 | OK | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.6M → Pro Forma $-6.1M (+$406K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$406K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+538bps
Margin Improvement
$289K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$406K
Modeled Uplift
$245K
Risk-Adjusted
-$161K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$153K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$151K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$92K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$406K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$145K$8K$153K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$151K$151K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$23K$69K$92K$289K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$38K$77K$115K$153K$153K$153K$153K
Cost to Collect$0$38K$75K$113K$151K$151K$151K$151K
A/R Days Reduction$0$31K$61K$92K$92K$92K$92K$92K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$111K$223K$329K$406K$406K$406K$406K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $406K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.6M$-6.6M-86.9%
Year 1$-6.7M+$270K$-6.5M-85.9%
Year 2$-7.0M+$406K$-6.5M-86.8%
Year 3$-7.2M+$406K$-6.8M-89.6%
Year 4$-7.4M+$406K$-7.0M-92.4%
Year 5$-7.6M+$406K$-7.2M-95.4%
$-65.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-79.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-13.6M
Value Created
$-7.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.4M
Organic Growth
$4.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$77K$115K$153K$184K
Cost to Collect$75K$113K$151K$181K
A/R Days Reduction$46K$69K$92K$110K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$203K$304K$406K$487K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-26.2%-16.7%-1.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross35.6%20.5%40.5%52.2%
P44
Occupancy12.6%15.5%26.0%49.9%
P15
Rev/Bed$302K$343K$604K$1.0M
P18
Exp/Bed$564K$484K$731K$1.4M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML