Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARNEGIE TRI-COUNTY MUNICIPAL HOSPIT 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARNEGIE TRI-COUNTY MUNICIPAL HOSPIT
CCN 371334 | OK | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.0M → Pro Forma $-2.1M (+$959K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$959K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$699K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$959K
Modeled Uplift
$638K
Risk-Adjusted
-$321K
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$365K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$361K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$222K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$959K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$365K$365K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$351K$10K$361K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$166K$222K$699K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$91K$182K$273K$365K$365K$365K$365K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$90K$180K$271K$361K$361K$361K$361K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$148K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$261K$522K$778K$959K$959K$959K$959K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $959K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.0M$-3.0M-16.6%
Year 1$-3.1M+$639K$-2.5M-13.6%
Year 2$-3.2M+$959K$-2.2M-12.3%
Year 3$-3.3M+$959K$-2.3M-12.9%
Year 4$-3.4M+$959K$-2.4M-13.4%
Year 5$-3.5M+$959K$-2.5M-14.0%
$-30.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-28.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.2M
Value Created
$-2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.8M
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$182K$273K$365K$437K
Denial Rate Reductio$180K$271K$361K$433K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$166K$222K$266K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$479K$719K$959K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.6%-29.3%-18.0%-5.6%
P56
Net-to-Gross97.1%21.3%44.6%53.8%
P97
Occupancy46.0%14.5%25.8%50.3%
P68
Rev/Bed$1.1M$322K$525K$845K
P82
Exp/Bed$1.2M$482K$700K$1.2M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML