Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MANGUM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MANGUM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 371330 | OK | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.5M → Pro Forma $-1.7M (+$805K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$805K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$587K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$805K
Modeled Uplift
$560K
Risk-Adjusted
-$244K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$306K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$303K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$186K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$805K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$306K$306K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$294K$8K$303K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$139K$186K$587K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$76K$153K$229K$306K$306K$306K$306K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$76K$151K$227K$303K$303K$303K$303K
A/R Days Reduction$0$62K$124K$186K$186K$186K$186K$186K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$219K$438K$653K$805K$805K$805K$805K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $805K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.5M$-2.5M-16.4%
Year 1$-2.6M+$537K$-2.1M-13.4%
Year 2$-2.7M+$805K$-1.9M-12.2%
Year 3$-2.7M+$805K$-1.9M-12.7%
Year 4$-2.8M+$805K$-2.0M-13.2%
Year 5$-2.9M+$805K$-2.1M-13.8%
$-25.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-23.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$-2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.0M
Organic Growth
$8.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$153K$229K$306K$367K
Denial Rate Reductio$151K$227K$303K$363K
A/R Days Reduction$93K$140K$186K$223K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$402K$604K$805K$966K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.4%-29.5%-17.9%-2.0%
P57
Net-to-Gross84.4%21.1%44.5%54.1%
P95
Occupancy54.9%14.9%26.6%50.6%
P80
Rev/Bed$850K$325K$562K$850K
P74
Exp/Bed$990K$481K$694K$1.2M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML