Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEATHERFORD REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEATHERFORD REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 371323 | OK | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.8M → Pro Forma $-768K (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-768K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$777K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$667K
Risk-Adjusted
-$399K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$405K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$401K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$246K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$405K$405K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$390K$11K$401K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$62K$184K$246K$777K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$101K$203K$304K$405K$405K$405K$405K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$100K$201K$301K$401K$401K$401K$401K
A/R Days Reduction$0$82K$164K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$290K$580K$864K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.8M$-1.8M-9.1%
Year 1$-1.9M+$710K$-1.2M-5.8%
Year 2$-1.9M+$1.1M$-880K-4.3%
Year 3$-2.0M+$1.1M$-938K-4.6%
Year 4$-2.1M+$1.1M$-999K-4.9%
Year 5$-2.1M+$1.1M$-1.1M-5.2%
$-18.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.7M
Value Created
$-1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.9M
Organic Growth
$10.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$203K$304K$405K$486K
Denial Rate Reductio$201K$301K$401K$481K
A/R Days Reduction$123K$185K$246K$296K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$16K
Total$533K$799K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.1%-26.2%-16.7%-1.1%
P61
Net-to-Gross41.1%20.5%40.5%52.2%
P51
Occupancy25.8%15.5%26.0%49.9%
P49
Rev/Bed$810K$343K$604K$1.0M
P62
Exp/Bed$884K$484K$731K$1.4M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML