Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL VINITA 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL VINITA
CCN 370237 | OK | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $4.0M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$995K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$846K
Risk-Adjusted
-$518K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$519K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$513K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$316K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$519K$519K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$499K$14K$513K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$80K$236K$316K$995K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$130K$259K$389K$519K$519K$519K$519K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$128K$257K$385K$513K$513K$513K$513K
A/R Days Reduction$0$105K$210K$316K$316K$316K$316K$316K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$371K$743K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M10.2%
Year 1$2.7M+$909K$3.6M14.0%
Year 2$2.8M+$1.4M$4.2M16.1%
Year 3$2.9M+$1.4M$4.2M16.4%
Year 4$3.0M+$1.4M$4.3M16.7%
Year 5$3.1M+$1.4M$4.4M17.1%
$26.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$48.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.3M
Value Created
$4.4M
Exit EBITDA
$4.2M
Organic Growth
$13.6M
RCM Value Creation
$4.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$259K$389K$519K$622K
Denial Rate Reductio$257K$385K$513K$616K
A/R Days Reduction$158K$237K$316K$379K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$17K$20K
Total$682K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-24.1%-9.8%3.3%
P86
Net-to-Gross24.9%20.5%35.6%49.1%
P35
Occupancy23.6%17.0%28.4%54.5%
P38
Rev/Bed$741K$373K$627K$1.1M
P58
Exp/Bed$665K$436K$714K$1.5M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML