Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TULSA SPINE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TULSA SPINE HOSPITAL
CCN 370216 | OK | 38 beds | Current EBITDA $8.0M → Pro Forma $11.7M (+$3.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.7M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$846K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$44K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$213K$633K$846K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$348K$695K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$344K$688K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$282K$564K$846K$846K$846K$846K$846K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Cumulative$0$996K$2.0M$3.0M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.0M$8.0M11.6%
Year 1$8.3M+$2.4M$10.7M15.4%
Year 2$8.5M+$3.7M$12.2M17.5%
Year 3$8.8M+$3.7M$12.4M17.9%
Year 4$9.1M+$3.7M$12.7M18.3%
Year 5$9.3M+$3.7M$13.0M18.7%
$80.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$142.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$62.4M
Value Created
$13.0M
Exit EBITDA
$12.8M
Organic Growth
$36.6M
RCM Value Creation
$13.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$695K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$688K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$423K$634K$846K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$44K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.6%-23.9%-9.4%3.4%
P88
Net-to-Gross19.0%20.1%32.6%46.8%
P23
Occupancy15.9%17.4%28.4%54.2%
P21
Rev/Bed$1.8M$370K$626K$1.2M
P89
Exp/Bed$1.6M$431K$722K$1.6M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML