Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LINDSAY MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LINDSAY MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
CCN 370214 | OK | 26 beds | Current EBITDA $-323K → Pro Forma $545K (+$867K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-323K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$867K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$545K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$632K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$867K
Modeled Uplift
$616K
Risk-Adjusted
-$251K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$330K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$326K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$201K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$867K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$330K$330K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$317K$9K$326K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$150K$201K$632K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$82K$165K$247K$330K$330K$330K$330K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$82K$163K$245K$326K$326K$326K$326K
A/R Days Reduction$0$67K$134K$201K$201K$201K$201K$201K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$236K$472K$703K$867K$867K$867K$867K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $867K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.5x
Headroom (turns)
177%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 177% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -5.0x, adding 104.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-323K$-323K-2.0%
Year 1$-332K+$578K$246K1.5%
Year 2$-342K+$867K$525K3.2%
Year 3$-352K+$867K$515K3.1%
Year 4$-363K+$867K$504K3.1%
Year 5$-374K+$867K$493K3.0%
$-3.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.7M
Value Created
$493K
Exit EBITDA
$-514K
Organic Growth
$8.7M
RCM Value Creation
$493K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$165K$247K$330K$396K
Denial Rate Reductio$163K$245K$326K$392K
A/R Days Reduction$100K$150K$201K$241K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$434K$650K$867K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.0%-26.1%-16.6%-1.2%
P71
Net-to-Gross100.0%20.6%39.0%51.9%
P99
Occupancy66.6%15.7%26.8%50.6%
P87
Rev/Bed$634K$346K$612K$1.1M
P52
Exp/Bed$646K$487K$741K$1.4M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML