Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INTEGRIS CANADIAN VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INTEGRIS CANADIAN VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 370211 | OK | 66 beds | Current EBITDA $3.9M → Pro Forma $8.4M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$84.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.1M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$54K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$260K$772K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$54K$54K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$424K$849K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$420K$840K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$344K$689K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.6x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.2x
9.0x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.7x
10.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.7x
11.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
12.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
39%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 39% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.9M$3.9M4.6%
Year 1$4.0M+$3.0M$7.0M8.3%
Year 2$4.1M+$4.5M$8.6M10.1%
Year 3$4.3M+$4.5M$8.7M10.3%
Year 4$4.4M+$4.5M$8.9M10.4%
Year 5$4.5M+$4.5M$9.0M10.6%
$39.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$99.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$59.9M
Value Created
$9.0M
Exit EBITDA
$6.2M
Organic Growth
$44.7M
RCM Value Creation
$9.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$849K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$840K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$516K$775K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$41K$54K$65K
Total$2.2M$3.3M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.6%-19.8%-3.8%7.6%
P69
Net-to-Gross16.4%18.4%25.8%33.7%
P15
Occupancy61.2%23.6%44.7%67.5%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.3M$397K$741K$1.4M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.2M$428K$1.0M$1.6M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML