Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HILLCREST HOSPITAL HENRYETTA 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HILLCREST HOSPITAL HENRYETTA
CCN 370183 | OK | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.6M → Pro Forma $-2.8M (+$829K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$829K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$604K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$829K
Modeled Uplift
$528K
Risk-Adjusted
-$300K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$315K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$312K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$192K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$829K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$315K$315K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$303K$9K$312K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$143K$192K$604K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$79K$158K$236K$315K$315K$315K$315K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$78K$156K$234K$312K$312K$312K$312K
A/R Days Reduction$0$64K$128K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$226K$451K$672K$829K$829K$829K$829K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $829K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.6M$-3.6M-22.8%
Year 1$-3.7M+$553K$-3.1M-20.0%
Year 2$-3.8M+$829K$-3.0M-18.9%
Year 3$-3.9M+$829K$-3.1M-19.7%
Year 4$-4.0M+$829K$-3.2M-20.4%
Year 5$-4.2M+$829K$-3.3M-21.2%
$-35.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-36.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-773K
Value Created
$-3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.7M
Organic Growth
$8.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$158K$236K$315K$378K
Denial Rate Reductio$156K$234K$312K$374K
A/R Days Reduction$96K$144K$192K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$414K$622K$829K$995K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.8%-41.0%-17.8%-6.1%
P41
Net-to-Gross16.9%29.4%45.6%57.5%
P2
Occupancy27.8%15.7%27.8%52.1%
P49
Rev/Bed$1.1M$338K$591K$845K
P80
Exp/Bed$1.3M$504K$720K$1.2M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML