Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INTEGRIS SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INTEGRIS SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 370106 | OK | 169 beds | Current EBITDA $-36.2M → Pro Forma $-22.2M (+$14.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$267.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-36.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-22.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$14.1M
Modeled Uplift
$10.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.5M (vs $14.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$171K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$147K$5.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$821K$2.4M$3.3M$10.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$171K$171K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.4M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-36.2M$-36.2M-13.5%
Year 1$-37.3M+$9.4M$-27.9M-10.4%
Year 2$-38.4M+$14.1M$-24.4M-9.1%
Year 3$-39.6M+$14.1M$-25.5M-9.5%
Year 4$-40.8M+$14.1M$-26.7M-10.0%
Year 5$-42.0M+$14.1M$-27.9M-10.4%
$-362.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-307.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$55.1M
Value Created
$-27.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-57.7M
Organic Growth
$140.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-27.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$128K$171K$206K
Total$7.0M$10.6M$14.1M$16.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.5%-24.0%-7.9%1.0%
P38
Net-to-Gross15.6%18.8%24.1%29.1%
P14
Occupancy83.2%44.5%57.4%67.7%
P86
Rev/Bed$1.6M$552K$1.0M$1.4M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.8M$670K$974K$1.6M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML