Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHOCTAW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHOCTAW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 370100 | OK | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $-2.0M (+$435K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$435K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+536bps
Margin Improvement
$311K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$435K
Modeled Uplift
$264K
Risk-Adjusted
-$171K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$164K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$162K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$99K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$435K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$156K$8K$164K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$162K$162K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$25K$74K$99K$311K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$41K$82K$123K$164K$164K$164K$164K
Cost to Collect$0$41K$81K$122K$162K$162K$162K$162K
A/R Days Reduction$0$33K$66K$99K$99K$99K$99K$99K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$119K$239K$353K$435K$435K$435K$435K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $435K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-29.5%
Year 1$-2.5M+$290K$-2.2M-26.8%
Year 2$-2.5M+$435K$-2.1M-25.9%
Year 3$-2.6M+$435K$-2.2M-26.9%
Year 4$-2.7M+$435K$-2.3M-27.8%
Year 5$-2.8M+$435K$-2.3M-28.8%
$-23.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-25.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.8M
Value Created
$-2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.8M
Organic Growth
$4.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$82K$123K$164K$197K
Cost to Collect$81K$122K$162K$195K
A/R Days Reduction$49K$74K$99K$118K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$217K$326K$435K$522K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-29.5%-23.7%-9.9%3.3%
P16
Net-to-Gross25.8%20.6%35.7%49.8%
P35
Occupancy19.6%17.0%28.4%54.2%
P29
Rev/Bed$239K$375K$627K$1.1M
P9
Exp/Bed$309K$440K$714K$1.4M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML