Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STILLWATER MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STILLWATER MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 370049 | OK | 52 beds | Current EBITDA $-26.7M → Pro Forma $-12.5M (+$14.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$270.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-26.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-12.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

80%
Realization (B)
$14.2M
Modeled Uplift
$11.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 80% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.4M (vs $14.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$173K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$149K$5.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$829K$2.5M$3.3M$10.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$173K$173K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$173K$173K$173K$173K$173K$173K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.5M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-26.7M$-26.7M-9.9%
Year 1$-27.5M+$9.5M$-18.0M-6.7%
Year 2$-28.3M+$14.2M$-14.1M-5.2%
Year 3$-29.2M+$14.2M$-14.9M-5.5%
Year 4$-30.0M+$14.2M$-15.8M-5.9%
Year 5$-30.9M+$14.2M$-16.7M-6.2%
$-266.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-183.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$82.9M
Value Created
$-16.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-42.5M
Organic Growth
$142.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-16.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$130K$173K$208K
Total$7.1M$10.7M$14.2M$17.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.9%-18.7%-3.3%6.1%
P36
Net-to-Gross27.4%18.0%25.8%35.8%
P55
Occupancy82.2%20.5%35.7%65.2%
P85
Rev/Bed$5.2M$389K$695K$1.5M
P98
Exp/Bed$5.7M$418K$1.1M$1.6M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML