Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL
CCN 370037 | OK | 430 beds | Current EBITDA $-73.5M → Pro Forma $-36.1M (+$37.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$711.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-73.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$37.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-36.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$27.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$37.4M
Modeled Uplift
$26.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $26.4M (vs $37.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$455K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$37.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.2M$14.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.7M$391K$14.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.5M$8.7M$27.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$455K$455K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.6M$7.1M$10.7M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.6M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$228K$455K$455K$455K$455K$455K$455K
Cumulative$0$10.2M$20.4M$30.3M$37.4M$37.4M$37.4M$37.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $37.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-73.5M$-73.5M-10.3%
Year 1$-75.7M+$24.9M$-50.8M-7.1%
Year 2$-78.0M+$37.4M$-40.6M-5.7%
Year 3$-80.3M+$37.4M$-42.9M-6.0%
Year 4$-82.7M+$37.4M$-45.3M-6.4%
Year 5$-85.2M+$37.4M$-47.8M-6.7%
$-735.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-525.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$209.3M
Value Created
$-47.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-117.1M
Organic Growth
$374.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-47.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.1M$10.7M$14.2M$17.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.0M$10.6M$14.1M$16.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
Clean Claim Rate$228K$341K$455K$546K
Total$18.7M$28.1M$37.4M$44.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.3%-8.3%-1.9%6.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross20.3%17.9%20.6%24.7%
P38
Occupancy75.1%63.3%74.2%75.5%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M
P38
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML