Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCALESTER REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCALESTER REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 370034 | OK | 117 beds | Current EBITDA $-32.5M → Pro Forma $-28.8M (+$3.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$71.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-32.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-28.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$3.8M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$872K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$46K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$39K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$220K$652K$872K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$46K$46K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$358K$717K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$355K$710K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$291K$582K$872K$872K$872K$872K$872K
Clean Claim Rate$0$23K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K
Cumulative$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-32.5M$-32.5M-45.4%
Year 1$-33.5M+$2.5M$-31.0M-43.2%
Year 2$-34.5M+$3.8M$-30.7M-42.9%
Year 3$-35.5M+$3.8M$-31.8M-44.3%
Year 4$-36.6M+$3.8M$-32.8M-45.8%
Year 5$-37.7M+$3.8M$-33.9M-47.3%
$-325.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-373.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-48.0M
Value Created
$-33.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-51.8M
Organic Growth
$37.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-33.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$717K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$710K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$436K$654K$872K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$23K$34K$46K$55K
Total$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-45.4%-15.2%-2.8%8.5%
P6
Net-to-Gross29.6%18.0%25.8%33.7%
P69
Occupancy23.6%36.2%57.6%73.2%
P8
Rev/Bed$613K$476K$1.0M$1.4M
P34
Exp/Bed$891K$416K$996K$1.6M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML