Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALLIANCEHEALTH DURANT 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALLIANCEHEALTH DURANT
CCN 370014 | OK | 105 beds | Current EBITDA $27.8M → Pro Forma $33.8M (+$6.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$113.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$27.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$33.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$6.0M
Modeled Uplift
$4.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.2M (vs $6.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$73K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$63K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$349K$1.0M$1.4M$4.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$73K$73K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$568K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$563K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$461K$922K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.8M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$27.8M$27.8M24.4%
Year 1$28.6M+$4.0M$32.6M28.7%
Year 2$29.5M+$6.0M$35.5M31.2%
Year 3$30.4M+$6.0M$36.3M32.0%
Year 4$31.3M+$6.0M$37.2M32.8%
Year 5$32.2M+$6.0M$38.2M33.6%
$277.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$420.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$142.2M
Value Created
$38.2M
Exit EBITDA
$44.2M
Organic Growth
$59.8M
RCM Value Creation
$38.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$692K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$55K$73K$87K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.4%-15.2%-2.8%8.5%
P92
Net-to-Gross8.7%18.3%25.8%33.7%
P0
Occupancy57.4%36.2%58.6%78.3%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.1M$476K$783K$1.4M
P56
Exp/Bed$818K$416K$932K$1.6M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML