Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY 2026-04-26 04:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
CCN 370008 | OK | 322 beds | Current EBITDA $-43.9M → Pro Forma $-15.4M (+$28.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$540.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-43.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-15.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$28.4M
Modeled Uplift
$18.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.9M (vs $28.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$346K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.8M$10.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.4M$297K$10.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$4.9M$6.6M$20.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$346K$346K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$173K$346K$346K$346K$346K$346K$346K
Cumulative$0$7.7M$15.5M$23.1M$28.4M$28.4M$28.4M$28.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-43.9M$-43.9M-8.1%
Year 1$-45.2M+$19.0M$-26.2M-4.9%
Year 2$-46.6M+$28.4M$-18.1M-3.3%
Year 3$-48.0M+$28.4M$-19.5M-3.6%
Year 4$-49.4M+$28.4M$-20.9M-3.9%
Year 5$-50.9M+$28.4M$-22.4M-4.1%
$-438.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-246.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$192.2M
Value Created
$-22.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-69.9M
Organic Growth
$284.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-22.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$12.8M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
Clean Claim Rate$173K$260K$346K$415K
Total$14.2M$21.3M$28.4M$34.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 9 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.1%-8.7%-7.9%-0.5%
P33
Net-to-Gross20.9%18.3%20.9%24.7%
P44
Occupancy51.8%62.7%75.1%75.6%
P11
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.4M$1.6M$1.7M
P78
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML