Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PONCA CITY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PONCA CITY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 370006 | OK | 47 beds | Current EBITDA $2.0M → Pro Forma $4.8M (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$52.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$900K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$643K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$29K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$162K$481K$643K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$264K$529K$793K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$262K$524K$785K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$214K$429K$643K$643K$643K$643K$643K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$758K$1.5M$2.3M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.6x78% / 17.7x82% / 19.8x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.8x
9.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x
10.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x
11.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
12.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.0M$2.0M3.7%
Year 1$2.0M+$1.9M$3.9M7.3%
Year 2$2.1M+$2.8M$4.9M9.2%
Year 3$2.2M+$2.8M$4.9M9.3%
Year 4$2.2M+$2.8M$5.0M9.5%
Year 5$2.3M+$2.8M$5.1M9.6%
$19.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$55.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$36.0M
Value Created
$5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$3.1M
Organic Growth
$27.8M
RCM Value Creation
$5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$529K$793K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$524K$785K$1.0M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$322K$483K$643K$772K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$25K$34K$41K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-23.3%-9.8%2.8%
P79
Net-to-Gross13.3%20.6%32.6%46.4%
P1
Occupancy47.3%19.1%32.9%54.0%
P63
Rev/Bed$1.1M$375K$627K$1.2M
P72
Exp/Bed$1.1M$433K$723K$1.6M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML