Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 370001 | OK | 424 beds | Current EBITDA $-19.6M → Pro Forma $11.4M (+$31.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$590.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-19.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$31.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$31.0M
Modeled Uplift
$21.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.9M (vs $31.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$378K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$31.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.8M$11.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.4M$325K$11.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.4M$7.2M$22.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$378K$378K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.0M$5.9M$8.9M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.8M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$189K$378K$378K$378K$378K$378K$378K
Cumulative$0$8.5M$16.9M$25.2M$31.0M$31.0M$31.0M$31.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $31.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-14.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
21.0x
Headroom (turns)
323%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 323% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -14.5x, adding 113.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-19.6M$-19.6M-3.3%
Year 1$-20.2M+$20.7M$493K0.1%
Year 2$-20.8M+$31.0M$10.2M1.7%
Year 3$-21.4M+$31.0M$9.6M1.6%
Year 4$-22.1M+$31.0M$9.0M1.5%
Year 5$-22.7M+$31.0M$8.3M1.4%
$-196.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$91.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$287.5M
Value Created
$8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-31.2M
Organic Growth
$310.4M
RCM Value Creation
$8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.9M$8.9M$11.8M$14.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.8M$8.8M$11.7M$14.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$189K$283K$378K$453K
Total$15.5M$23.3M$31.0M$37.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.3%-8.3%-1.9%6.1%
P38
Net-to-Gross13.7%17.9%20.6%24.7%
P0
Occupancy75.6%63.3%74.2%75.5%
P75
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M
P25
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML