Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT CARMEL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 15:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT CARMEL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 364062 | OH | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $869K → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$922K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$869K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$922K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$672K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$922K
Modeled Uplift
$629K
Risk-Adjusted
-$293K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$351K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$347K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$213K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$922K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$351K$351K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$337K$10K$347K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$54K$160K$213K$672K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$88K$175K$263K$351K$351K$351K$351K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$87K$174K$260K$347K$347K$347K$347K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$142K$213K$213K$213K$213K$213K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$251K$502K$748K$922K$922K$922K$922K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $922K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x
9.0x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.8x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x
10.0x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x
11.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
12.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
37%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 37% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$869K$869K5.0%
Year 1$895K+$615K$1.5M8.6%
Year 2$922K+$922K$1.8M10.5%
Year 3$949K+$922K$1.9M10.7%
Year 4$978K+$922K$1.9M10.8%
Year 5$1.0M+$922K$1.9M11.0%
$8.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.5M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$9.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$175K$263K$351K$421K
Denial Rate Reductio$174K$260K$347K$417K
A/R Days Reduction$107K$160K$213K$256K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$461K$692K$922K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 99 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.0%-11.4%2.8%10.0%
P58
Net-to-Gross31.0%23.2%30.9%40.1%
P50
Occupancy63.2%33.6%54.6%67.3%
P69
Rev/Bed$219K$327K$929K$1.4M
P15
Exp/Bed$208K$312K$720K$1.4M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML