Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVER VISTA HEALTH & WELNESS 2026-04-26 17:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVER VISTA HEALTH & WELNESS
CCN 364061 | OH | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $4.1M → Pro Forma $5.2M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$810K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$773K
Risk-Adjusted
-$339K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$423K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$418K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$257K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$423K$423K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$407K$12K$418K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$65K$192K$257K$810K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$106K$211K$317K$423K$423K$423K$423K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$105K$209K$314K$418K$418K$418K$418K
A/R Days Reduction$0$86K$171K$257K$257K$257K$257K$257K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$303K$605K$901K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.1M$4.1M19.2%
Year 1$4.2M+$741K$4.9M23.3%
Year 2$4.3M+$1.1M$5.4M25.7%
Year 3$4.4M+$1.1M$5.6M26.3%
Year 4$4.6M+$1.1M$5.7M26.9%
Year 5$4.7M+$1.1M$5.8M27.6%
$40.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$64.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.4M
Value Created
$5.8M
Exit EBITDA
$6.5M
Organic Growth
$11.1M
RCM Value Creation
$5.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$211K$317K$423K$507K
Denial Rate Reductio$209K$314K$418K$502K
A/R Days Reduction$129K$193K$257K$309K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$16K
Total$556K$834K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 99 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.2%-11.4%2.8%10.0%
P90
Net-to-Gross17.9%23.2%30.9%40.1%
P17
Occupancy67.2%33.6%54.6%67.3%
P74
Rev/Bed$264K$327K$929K$1.4M
P21
Exp/Bed$213K$312K$720K$1.4M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML