Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASSURANCE HEALTH HUDSON 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASSURANCE HEALTH HUDSON
CCN 364059 | OH | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $-259K → Pro Forma $61K (+$320K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-259K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$320K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$61K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+545bps
Margin Improvement
$225K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$320K
Modeled Uplift
$232K
Risk-Adjusted
-$88K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$121K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$118K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$72K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+16bp
Total EBITDA Impact$320K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$113K$8K$121K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$118K$118K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$18K$53K$72K$225K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$30K$61K$91K$121K$121K$121K$121K
Cost to Collect$0$29K$59K$88K$118K$118K$118K$118K
A/R Days Reduction$0$24K$48K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$88K$177K$260K$320K$320K$320K$320K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $320K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-35.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
42.3x
Headroom (turns)
651%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 651% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -35.8x, adding 134.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-259K$-259K-4.4%
Year 1$-267K+$213K$-53K-0.9%
Year 2$-275K+$320K$45K0.8%
Year 3$-283K+$320K$37K0.6%
Year 4$-291K+$320K$29K0.5%
Year 5$-300K+$320K$20K0.3%
$-2.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$219K
Exit EV (11x)
$2.8M
Value Created
$20K
Exit EBITDA
$-412K
Organic Growth
$3.2M
RCM Value Creation
$20K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$61K$91K$121K$146K
Cost to Collect$59K$88K$118K$141K
A/R Days Reduction$36K$54K$72K$86K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$160K$240K$320K$384K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.4%-11.5%-1.9%11.0%
P42
Net-to-Gross52.1%28.4%38.2%47.2%
P87
Occupancy80.5%24.8%37.1%58.5%
P99
Rev/Bed$255K$487K$1.1M$2.3M
P10
Exp/Bed$267K$503K$1.2M$2.2M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML