Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GBH - GENEVA 2026-04-26 15:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GBH - GENEVA
CCN 364054 | OH | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$307K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$307K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+546bps
Margin Improvement
$216K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$307K
Modeled Uplift
$222K
Risk-Adjusted
-$86K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$117K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$113K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$69K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+17bp
Total EBITDA Impact$307K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$108K$8K$117K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$113K$113K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$17K$51K$69K$216K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$29K$58K$87K$117K$117K$117K$117K
Cost to Collect$0$28K$56K$84K$113K$113K$113K$113K
A/R Days Reduction$0$23K$46K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$85K$170K$250K$307K$307K$307K$307K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $307K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M24.6%
Year 1$1.4M+$205K$1.6M28.9%
Year 2$1.5M+$307K$1.8M31.5%
Year 3$1.5M+$307K$1.8M32.3%
Year 4$1.6M+$307K$1.9M33.1%
Year 5$1.6M+$307K$1.9M33.9%
$13.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.2M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$3.1M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$58K$87K$117K$140K
Cost to Collect$56K$84K$113K$135K
A/R Days Reduction$34K$51K$69K$82K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$154K$231K$307K$369K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.6%-12.2%-3.3%12.8%
P90
Net-to-Gross30.7%29.5%38.6%47.0%
P29
Occupancy78.5%24.4%36.4%53.0%
P97
Rev/Bed$282K$489K$1.3M$2.3M
P14
Exp/Bed$212K$532K$1.4M$2.4M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML