Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND SPRINGS 2026-04-27 01:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND SPRINGS
CCN 364053 | OH | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.0M → Pro Forma $-7.0M (+$981K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 364053

HIGHLAND SPRINGS
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$18.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$981K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$715K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$981K
Modeled Uplift
$710K
Risk-Adjusted
-$271K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$373K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$369K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$227K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$981K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$373K$373K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$359K$10K$369K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$57K$170K$227K$715K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$93K$186K$280K$373K$373K$373K$373K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$92K$185K$277K$369K$369K$369K$369K
A/R Days Reduction$0$76K$151K$227K$227K$227K$227K$227K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$267K$534K$795K$981K$981K$981K$981K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $981K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.0M$-8.0M-43.1%
Year 1$-8.3M+$654K$-7.6M-40.9%
Year 2$-8.5M+$981K$-7.5M-40.4%
Year 3$-8.8M+$981K$-7.8M-41.8%
Year 4$-9.0M+$981K$-8.1M-43.2%
Year 5$-9.3M+$981K$-8.3M-44.7%
$-80.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-91.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-11.3M
Value Created
$-8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.8M
Organic Growth
$9.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$186K$280K$373K$447K
Denial Rate Reductio$185K$277K$369K$443K
A/R Days Reduction$113K$170K$227K$272K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$490K$736K$981K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 95 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-43.1%-14.4%1.4%9.5%
P6
Net-to-Gross26.1%22.3%31.0%41.5%
P33
Occupancy81.6%33.0%52.8%67.0%
P95
Rev/Bed$259K$304K$592K$1.4M
P22
Exp/Bed$370K$311K$551K$1.4M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML