Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL SVCS DAYTON 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL SVCS DAYTON
CCN 364048 | OH | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $-371K → Pro Forma $274K (+$645K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-371K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$645K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$274K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$468K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$645K
Modeled Uplift
$446K
Risk-Adjusted
-$199K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$244K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$243K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$148K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$645K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$244K$244K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$235K$8K$243K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$111K$148K$468K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$61K$122K$183K$244K$244K$244K$244K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$61K$122K$182K$243K$243K$243K$243K
A/R Days Reduction$0$49K$99K$148K$148K$148K$148K$148K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$176K$352K$523K$645K$645K$645K$645K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $645K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-11.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
18.0x
Headroom (turns)
277%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 277% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -11.5x, adding 110.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-371K$-371K-3.0%
Year 1$-383K+$430K$47K0.4%
Year 2$-394K+$645K$251K2.1%
Year 3$-406K+$645K$239K2.0%
Year 4$-418K+$645K$227K1.9%
Year 5$-431K+$645K$214K1.8%
$-3.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.1M
Value Created
$214K
Exit EBITDA
$-592K
Organic Growth
$6.5M
RCM Value Creation
$214K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$122K$183K$244K$293K
Denial Rate Reductio$122K$182K$243K$292K
A/R Days Reduction$74K$111K$148K$178K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$323K$484K$645K$774K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.0%-14.4%1.4%9.4%
P40
Net-to-Gross45.9%23.6%33.1%44.2%
P79
Occupancy69.2%31.2%49.4%67.1%
P81
Rev/Bed$207K$350K$592K$1.4M
P11
Exp/Bed$213K$314K$551K$1.5M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML