Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OHIO HOSPITAL FOR PSYCHIATRY 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OHIO HOSPITAL FOR PSYCHIATRY
CCN 364041 | OH | 130 beds | Current EBITDA $9.2M → Pro Forma $10.7M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$512K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$600K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$594K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$365K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$600K$600K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$577K$16K$594K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$92K$273K$365K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$150K$300K$450K$600K$600K$600K$600K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$148K$297K$445K$594K$594K$594K$594K
A/R Days Reduction$0$122K$243K$365K$365K$365K$365K$365K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$430K$859K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.2x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.2M$9.2M30.5%
Year 1$9.4M+$1.1M$10.5M35.0%
Year 2$9.7M+$1.6M$11.3M37.7%
Year 3$10.0M+$1.6M$11.6M38.6%
Year 4$10.3M+$1.6M$11.9M39.6%
Year 5$10.6M+$1.6M$12.2M40.7%
$91.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$134.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$42.6M
Value Created
$12.2M
Exit EBITDA
$14.6M
Organic Growth
$15.8M
RCM Value Creation
$12.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$300K$450K$600K$720K
Denial Rate Reductio$297K$445K$594K$713K
A/R Days Reduction$182K$274K$365K$438K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$789K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin30.5%-12.3%0.3%7.5%
P98
Net-to-Gross25.0%21.0%27.1%33.4%
P38
Occupancy60.9%43.5%54.7%68.6%
P61
Rev/Bed$231K$513K$1.2M$1.6M
P12
Exp/Bed$160K$366K$1.1M$1.6M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML