Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MENTAL HEALTH SRVS FOR CLARK COUNTY 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MENTAL HEALTH SRVS FOR CLARK COUNTY
CCN 364040 | OH | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.2M → Pro Forma $-2.7M (+$519K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$519K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+532bps
Margin Improvement
$374K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$519K
Modeled Uplift
$370K
Risk-Adjusted
-$150K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$196K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$195K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$119K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$519K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$188K$8K$196K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$195K$195K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$30K$89K$119K$374K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$49K$98K$147K$196K$196K$196K$196K
Cost to Collect$0$49K$98K$146K$195K$195K$195K$195K
A/R Days Reduction$0$40K$79K$119K$119K$119K$119K$119K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$142K$284K$422K$519K$519K$519K$519K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $519K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.2M$-3.2M-32.9%
Year 1$-3.3M+$346K$-3.0M-30.3%
Year 2$-3.4M+$519K$-2.9M-29.5%
Year 3$-3.5M+$519K$-3.0M-30.6%
Year 4$-3.6M+$519K$-3.1M-31.7%
Year 5$-3.7M+$519K$-3.2M-32.8%
$-32.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-35.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.1M
Value Created
$-3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.1M
Organic Growth
$5.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$98K$147K$196K$235K
Cost to Collect$98K$146K$195K$234K
A/R Days Reduction$59K$89K$119K$142K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$260K$389K$519K$623K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-32.9%-11.3%-3.2%14.6%
P10
Net-to-Gross26.6%28.6%37.8%45.5%
P14
Occupancy72.3%23.1%36.4%47.4%
P91
Rev/Bed$610K$720K$1.4M$2.3M
P21
Exp/Bed$810K$749K$1.4M$2.3M
P26

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML