Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 363303 | OH | 424 beds | Current EBITDA $-79.8M → Pro Forma $-25.1M (+$54.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.04B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-79.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$54.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-25.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$39.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$54.7M
Modeled Uplift
$36.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$18.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $36.6M (vs $54.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$20.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$20.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$666K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$54.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$20.8M$20.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$20.0M$572K$20.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.2M$9.5M$12.7M$39.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$666K$666K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.2M$10.4M$15.6M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.2M$10.3M$15.5M$20.6M$20.6M$20.6M$20.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.2M$8.4M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$333K$666K$666K$666K$666K$666K$666K
Cumulative$0$14.9M$29.8M$44.4M$54.7M$54.7M$54.7M$54.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $54.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-79.8M$-79.8M-7.7%
Year 1$-82.2M+$36.5M$-45.7M-4.4%
Year 2$-84.7M+$54.7M$-29.9M-2.9%
Year 3$-87.2M+$54.7M$-32.5M-3.1%
Year 4$-89.8M+$54.7M$-35.1M-3.4%
Year 5$-92.5M+$54.7M$-37.8M-3.6%
$-798.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-415.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$382.5M
Value Created
$-37.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-127.1M
Organic Growth
$547.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-37.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.4M$15.6M$20.8M$25.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.3M$15.5M$20.6M$24.7M
A/R Days Reduction$6.3M$9.5M$12.7M$15.2M
Clean Claim Rate$333K$499K$666K$799K
Total$27.4M$41.1M$54.7M$65.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.7%-7.2%-0.1%5.2%
P24
Net-to-Gross44.6%21.8%27.9%32.7%
P91
Occupancy58.8%58.8%67.6%76.5%
P24
Rev/Bed$2.5M$1.4M$1.8M$2.3M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML