Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EVEREST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL NORT 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EVEREST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL NORT
CCN 363045 | OH | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $219K → Pro Forma $378K (+$159K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$219K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$159K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$378K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+579bps
Margin Improvement
$105K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$159K
Modeled Uplift
$97K
Risk-Adjusted
-$61K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$61K
+223bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$55K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$33K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+35bp
Total EBITDA Impact$159K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$53K$8K$61K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$55K$55K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$8K$25K$33K$105K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$15K$30K$46K$61K$61K$61K$61K
Cost to Collect$0$14K$27K$41K$55K$55K$55K$55K
A/R Days Reduction$0$11K$22K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$45K$90K$130K$159K$159K$159K$159K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $159K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
9.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$219K$219K8.0%
Year 1$226K+$106K$332K12.1%
Year 2$233K+$159K$391K14.3%
Year 3$240K+$159K$398K14.5%
Year 4$247K+$159K$405K14.8%
Year 5$254K+$159K$413K15.1%
$2.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$4.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.3M
Value Created
$413K
Exit EBITDA
$349K
Organic Growth
$1.6M
RCM Value Creation
$413K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$30K$46K$61K$73K
Cost to Collect$27K$41K$55K$66K
A/R Days Reduction$17K$25K$33K$40K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$79K$119K$159K$190K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-11.3%-1.7%12.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross47.2%28.1%36.7%47.2%
P74
Occupancy26.0%26.3%37.5%62.6%
P23
Rev/Bed$76K$386K$1.0M$2.1M
P3
Exp/Bed$182K$370K$939K$2.1M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML