Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REUNION REHABILITATION HOSPITAL DUBL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REUNION REHABILITATION HOSPITAL DUBL
CCN 363044 | OH | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $3.0M (+$921K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$921K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$672K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$921K
Modeled Uplift
$645K
Risk-Adjusted
-$276K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$350K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$347K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$213K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$921K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$350K$350K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$337K$10K$347K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$54K$159K$213K$672K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$88K$175K$263K$350K$350K$350K$350K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$87K$173K$260K$347K$347K$347K$347K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$142K$213K$213K$213K$213K$213K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$251K$502K$747K$921K$921K$921K$921K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $921K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M12.0%
Year 1$2.2M+$614K$2.8M15.9%
Year 2$2.2M+$921K$3.2M18.0%
Year 3$2.3M+$921K$3.2M18.4%
Year 4$2.4M+$921K$3.3M18.8%
Year 5$2.4M+$921K$3.4M19.2%
$21.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.9M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$3.4M
Organic Growth
$9.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$175K$263K$350K$420K
Denial Rate Reductio$173K$260K$347K$416K
A/R Days Reduction$107K$160K$213K$256K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$461K$691K$921K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 114 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.0%-11.5%-1.6%11.8%
P75
Net-to-Gross48.7%27.7%36.6%45.8%
P80
Occupancy69.2%26.8%39.4%63.0%
P86
Rev/Bed$438K$359K$1.0M$2.0M
P32
Exp/Bed$385K$360K$928K$1.9M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML