Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF NORTHWEST 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF NORTHWEST
CCN 363040 | OH | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-268K → Pro Forma $470K (+$739K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-268K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$739K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$470K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$538K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$739K
Modeled Uplift
$501K
Risk-Adjusted
-$237K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$280K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$278K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$171K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$739K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$280K$280K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$270K$8K$278K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$128K$171K$538K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$70K$140K$210K$280K$280K$280K$280K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$70K$139K$209K$278K$278K$278K$278K
A/R Days Reduction$0$57K$114K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$201K$403K$599K$739K$739K$739K$739K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $739K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.3x
Headroom (turns)
174%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 174% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.8x, adding 103.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-268K$-268K-1.9%
Year 1$-276K+$492K$216K1.5%
Year 2$-284K+$739K$454K3.2%
Year 3$-293K+$739K$446K3.2%
Year 4$-302K+$739K$437K3.1%
Year 5$-311K+$739K$428K3.1%
$-2.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$4.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.4M
Value Created
$428K
Exit EBITDA
$-427K
Organic Growth
$7.4M
RCM Value Creation
$428K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$140K$210K$280K$336K
Denial Rate Reductio$139K$209K$278K$334K
A/R Days Reduction$85K$128K$171K$205K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$369K$554K$739K$886K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 114 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.9%-11.5%-1.6%11.8%
P46
Net-to-Gross61.0%27.7%36.6%45.8%
P96
Occupancy62.6%26.8%39.4%63.0%
P74
Rev/Bed$350K$359K$1.0M$2.0M
P22
Exp/Bed$357K$360K$928K$1.9M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML