Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OHIOHEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OHIOHEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 363037 | OH | 114 beds | Current EBITDA $5.9M → Pro Forma $8.1M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$741K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$829K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$821K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$504K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$829K$829K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$798K$23K$821K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$127K$377K$504K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$207K$414K$622K$829K$829K$829K$829K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$205K$410K$615K$821K$821K$821K$821K
A/R Days Reduction$0$168K$336K$504K$504K$504K$504K$504K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$594K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.9M$5.9M14.2%
Year 1$6.1M+$1.5M$7.5M18.1%
Year 2$6.2M+$2.2M$8.4M20.3%
Year 3$6.4M+$2.2M$8.6M20.8%
Year 4$6.6M+$2.2M$8.8M21.2%
Year 5$6.8M+$2.2M$9.0M21.7%
$58.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$99.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$40.2M
Value Created
$9.0M
Exit EBITDA
$9.4M
Organic Growth
$21.8M
RCM Value Creation
$9.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$414K$622K$829K$995K
Denial Rate Reductio$410K$615K$821K$985K
A/R Days Reduction$252K$378K$504K$605K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 101 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.2%-12.4%1.4%8.2%
P84
Net-to-Gross44.8%21.8%28.2%35.4%
P90
Occupancy54.6%43.3%54.8%69.5%
P49
Rev/Bed$364K$432K$1.2M$1.6M
P21
Exp/Bed$312K$370K$1.1M$1.6M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML