Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF OHIO 2026-04-26 09:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF OHIO
CCN 363033 | OH | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$889K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$849K
Risk-Adjusted
-$370K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$463K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$459K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$282K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$463K$463K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$446K$13K$459K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$71K$211K$282K$889K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$116K$232K$348K$463K$463K$463K$463K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$115K$229K$344K$459K$459K$459K$459K
A/R Days Reduction$0$94K$188K$282K$282K$282K$282K$282K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$332K$664K$989K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
9.0x62% / 11.2x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
10.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
11.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
12.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
37%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 37% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M4.9%
Year 1$1.2M+$813K$2.0M8.6%
Year 2$1.2M+$1.2M$2.4M10.5%
Year 3$1.2M+$1.2M$2.5M10.6%
Year 4$1.3M+$1.2M$2.5M10.8%
Year 5$1.3M+$1.2M$2.5M11.0%
$11.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$27.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.5M
Value Created
$2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$12.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$232K$348K$463K$556K
Denial Rate Reductio$229K$344K$459K$551K
A/R Days Reduction$141K$212K$282K$338K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$610K$914K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.9%-14.6%1.3%9.3%
P62
Net-to-Gross59.0%23.5%32.2%44.2%
P95
Occupancy69.9%31.6%50.7%67.5%
P82
Rev/Bed$386K$342K$592K$1.4M
P32
Exp/Bed$367K$315K$551K$1.5M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML