Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF TOLEDO 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF TOLEDO
CCN 362036 | OH | 45 beds | Current EBITDA $-423K → Pro Forma $843K (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-423K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$843K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$923K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$909K
Risk-Adjusted
-$357K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$481K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$476K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$293K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$481K$481K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$463K$13K$476K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$219K$293K$923K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$120K$241K$361K$481K$481K$481K$481K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$119K$238K$357K$476K$476K$476K$476K
A/R Days Reduction$0$98K$195K$293K$293K$293K$293K$293K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$345K$689K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.7x
Headroom (turns)
165%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 165% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.2x, adding 103.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-423K$-423K-1.8%
Year 1$-435K+$844K$408K1.7%
Year 2$-448K+$1.3M$817K3.4%
Year 3$-462K+$1.3M$804K3.3%
Year 4$-476K+$1.3M$790K3.3%
Year 5$-490K+$1.3M$775K3.2%
$-4.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.8M
Value Created
$775K
Exit EBITDA
$-673K
Organic Growth
$12.7M
RCM Value Creation
$775K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$241K$361K$481K$577K
Denial Rate Reductio$238K$357K$476K$571K
A/R Days Reduction$146K$220K$293K$351K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$15K$18K
Total$633K$949K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 116 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.8%-12.7%-1.6%10.3%
P48
Net-to-Gross10.2%26.1%36.4%45.4%
P0
Occupancy72.3%27.0%38.7%62.7%
P92
Rev/Bed$535K$362K$968K$1.9M
P38
Exp/Bed$544K$365K$902K$1.9M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML