Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - SOUTHEAST OHIO 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - SOUTHEAST OHIO
CCN 362031 | OH | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$898K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$898K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$655K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$898K
Modeled Uplift
$640K
Risk-Adjusted
-$258K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$342K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$338K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$208K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$898K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$342K$342K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$329K$9K$338K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$155K$208K$655K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$85K$171K$256K$342K$342K$342K$342K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$85K$169K$254K$338K$338K$338K$338K
A/R Days Reduction$0$69K$139K$208K$208K$208K$208K$208K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$245K$489K$728K$898K$898K$898K$898K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $898K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
9.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M9.3%
Year 1$1.6M+$599K$2.2M13.1%
Year 2$1.7M+$898K$2.6M15.1%
Year 3$1.7M+$898K$2.6M15.4%
Year 4$1.8M+$898K$2.7M15.7%
Year 5$1.8M+$898K$2.7M16.0%
$15.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$30.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.2M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$2.5M
Organic Growth
$9.0M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$171K$256K$342K$410K
Denial Rate Reductio$169K$254K$338K$406K
A/R Days Reduction$104K$156K$208K$249K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$449K$674K$898K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 101 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.3%-11.1%-1.6%12.0%
P67
Net-to-Gross15.7%29.1%37.8%47.4%
P5
Occupancy68.8%26.1%37.4%59.0%
P84
Rev/Bed$488K$387K$1.1M$2.1M
P33
Exp/Bed$443K$376K$979K$2.1M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML